Connect with us

Reviews

Beau is Afraid – How Afraid Are We All?

Published

on

 

Joaquin Phoenix – Beau is Afraid [credit: A24]

What does it teach us about mental health?


This is not the first Ari Aster movie that has divided the audience’s opinions. However, this horror dark comedy taught us a perspective of mental health which is rarely portrayed let alone creatively. The film explores how the main character Beau Wasserman (Phoenix) needs to get home to visit his mother Mona Wasserman (LuPone).

As a character, Phoenix really devels into a character with body language by showing the fight and flight response. These emotions are depicted with great sensitivity and authenticity, shedding light on the debilitating impact they can have on one’s thoughts, perceptions, and overall well-being. The movie vividly illustrates the way in which excessive fear can warp an individual’s reality, leading to a distorted perception of the world around them.

Beau’s journey is marked by a sense of isolation and alienation. He becomes increasingly withdrawn from his loved ones and the outside world, trapped in his own inner turmoil. This portrayal highlights the isolating nature of mental health struggles, conveying the challenges faced by individuals who feel disconnected from others due to their anxiety or paranoia. The film serves as a reminder of the importance of empathy and support for those experiencing mental health difficulties.

The film employs a combination of visually stunning shots and clever camera angles to create a sense of unease and disorientation. The lighting and colour palette further enhance the eerie atmosphere, making even the most mundane scenes feel foreboding. The skilful use of sound design, particularly the haunting musical score, contributes to the overall sense of dread, effectively immersing the viewer in Beau’s growing paranoia.

Joaquin Phoenix – Beau is Afraid [credit: A24]

“Beau is Afraid” also touches upon the impact of past trauma on one’s mental health. The character’s deep-rooted fears and anxieties are rooted

in a traumatic event from his past, which resurfaces and intensifies throughout the narrative. The film sensitively explores the long-lasting effects of trauma on an individual’s psyche and highlights the need for proper support and healing to address these wounds.

The film masterfully weaves together suspense, mystery, and psychological elements, keeping the audience on edge throughout. The pacing is deliberate, slowly building tension and raising questions that demand answers. As the story progresses, the plot twists and turns, constantly challenging the viewers’ perceptions and leaving them second-guessing what is real and what is merely a figment of Beau’s imagination.

One of the film’s central themes is the fragility of perception and the blurring of the line between reality and imagination. Beau’s growing paranoia leads him to question the authenticity of his experiences, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty for both the character and the audience. This exploration of perception resonates with the complexities of mental health, where one’s own thoughts and fears can shape their understanding of the world. Beyond its surface-level thrills, “Beau is Afraid” delves into profound themes that resonate long after the credits roll.

Joaquin Phoenix – Beau is Afraid [credit: A24]

The film explores the nature of fear, highlighting its power to consume and distort reality. It examines the effects of isolation and trauma on the human psyche, offering a thought-provoking commentary on the fragile nature of our perceptions. Symbolism is subtly incorporated throughout the film, adding depth to the storytelling and inviting further analysis.

By intertwining these elements, “Beau is Afraid” provides a compelling narrative that sheds light on the multifaceted nature of mental health challenges. It offers a poignant depiction of the psychological toll that anxiety, fear, and paranoia can have on an individual, highlighting the importance of understanding, compassion, and support for those grappling with such issues. Beau’s development is superb, with Phoenix delivering a standout performance that expertly captures the complex emotions and inner turmoil of his character. The supporting characters add depth to the story, each playing a crucial role in amplifying the tension and uncertainty. For fans of the genre, “Beau is Afraid” is an absolute must-watch, a chilling and engrossing cinematic journey that will keep you guessing until the very end.

FILM RATING
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Reviews

Polite Society Review l Kick-Ass British South Asian Representation That’s Needed

Published

on

It’s hard to think Nida Manzoor composed this remarkable and daring script while studying politics at the University College of London (UCL) 10 years ago. The film then premiered at the Sundance Film Festival and the Glasgow Film Festival, where it earned rave reviews.

The film follows Ria Khan (Priya Kansara), a high school girl who dreams of becoming a stuntwoman. In London, Shephard Bush with her Pakistani Muslim family, including her older sister Lena Khan (Ritu Arya), who dropped out of art school. Ria is concerned not just about her Geography coursework, but also about her sister Lena’s engagement with Dr Salim Shah (Akshay Khanna). Ria has reservations about Salim and his evil mother (Nimra Bucha). Enlists the support of her high school pals Alba (Ella Bruccoleri) and Clara (Seraphina Beh) to save her sister and expose her opponents’ real colours.

Manzoor’s connection with her sister while practising martial arts inspired the writing. This took almost 10 years to master in order to guarantee Manzoor’s voice was fine-tuned throughout the plot and the characters.

However, this is not the only great script Manzoor has written, produced and directed. Channel 4 TV show We Are Lady Parts which also includes British Muslim Women’s representation was created by Manzoor and how they overcome the obstacles faced by them individually to come together to form a punk band.

Priya Kansara, the bright rising major actress who plays Ria Khan, was devoted to every single stunt in the film in order to understand Ria’s path of mastering her own material skills. Manzoor even refers to Kansara as the “next Tom Cruise,” citing how tough it was to perform the stunts while wearing hefty anarkalis. Tom Cruise is unlikely to be able to perform any of his stunts in Anarkalis.

Polite Society [credit: Focus Features]



Matthew Vaughn’s (Kick-Ass movies) and Edgar Wright’s (Scott Pilgrim vs. World) influence can be seen throughout the film, with parts of visible in the use of faux panels for stunts, title cards for chapter titles, and fluid transitions to keep you involved in the narrative. In addition to her tribute to Bollywood with music, dancing, and costumes, while having the primary ‘villain’ be depicted ostentatiously.

Overall, the film succeeds because it empowers South Asian women to choose their own paths and break out from the stereotyped mould that society (pun intended) and the media have traditionally represented them as. As a result, ultimately recognised via a family comedy action-packed film for being bold and courageous.

This is not one to be missed on the big screen at all so grab your tickets on 28th April and head down to the cinema to see Polite Society.

Stars: 4.5/5

FILM RATING
Continue Reading

Reviews

WWE 2K23 Review | Acknowledge It 

German suplexes and Superman punches and spears, oh my!

Published

on

This review was made possible by an advance copy of the WWE 2K23 Icon Edition. Thank you  to 2K Games! 


In a recent article, I used the expression, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” in the context of a sequel that attempted to replicate the success of its predecessor but ultimately failed to do so. The WWE 2K series has been filled with its ups and downs — WWE 2K20 is about as low as you can get — but WWE 2K22 was a massive step in the right direction after 2K took a year off between 2K20 and 2K22. And sometimes, a fresh coat of paint is all that’s required with a dash of improvements to make for a great game, and WWE 2K23 is proof of that. 

Beginning with the gameplay, 2K23 remains very similar to last year’s game. The mechanics are all the same, which works since 2K22 was a nice return to simplicity and found a happy medium between arcade-like controls and simulation. I’ll never quite understand why 2K took out the chain grappling at the beginning of matches — I lapsed from WWE from 2K15 until 2K20 — but that would be something nice to have in the future since not every match begins with the pacing of a Brock Lesnar vs. Goldberg. It would especially benefit the PLE main events that have a “big fight feel,” as Michael Cole likes to say as the crowd is going nuts and the wrestlers in the ring are going through the “feeling out” process. 

The ability to have two Payback abilities is nice — for example, you can use the “Low Blow” and “Comeback” features and not have to choose between the two. It’s especially helpful in Universe Mode matches when you want to link together real spots. 

A still from WWE 2K23 courtesy of 2K Games.

Speaking of Universe Mode, much like the rest of the game, it looks quite similar to last year’s game. But one key addition is the new “Rivalry Actions.” While promos are still absent — something that would really bring this mode together — these scenarios allow players to choose certain scenarios to play out pre, post, or during a match. For example, you can extend a rivalry after a big match on a PLE (the option to choose the length of rivalries is no longer in the game), or you can choose a scenario like a post-match attack that’ll take a superstar out of action for a set amount of months. The scenario that plays out is decided by factors such as momentum in the rivalry, but there’s also an option for “Free Mode” which will allow you to choose which one happens. 

The “Rivalry Actions” are a great addition to the game, giving new life to some of the cutscenes in previous WWE 2K installments while also bringing in a whole new batch of them. Promos would go the extra mile in making these storylines really come to life, but for now, the “Rivalry Actions” suffice. 

But 2K23 is not without its bugs. Luckily, none of these are as bad as the lows of 2K20, and I’m sure they’ll be patched with time. The first is the managers and their unreliable nature. When I assign Paul Heyman as Roman Reigns’ manager, I expect to see him walk out with his Tribal Chief and utilize the amazing entrance specific to this combination. But half of the time, Reigns comes out alone and it’s incredibly frustrating. Or if you choose two managers, only one will come out more times than not. 

A still from WWE 2K23 courtesy of 2K Games.

The AI can also be incredibly frustrating. I play on “Legend” difficulty, as the disparity between “Hard” and “Legend” is massive with the former being too easy, but multi-man matches are more frustrating than in previous years. Take the Royal Rumble match, for instance, which has always been tough to nail. Even in 2K22, there’d be occasions where the AI opponents would randomly crash the party and break up your moves. In 2K23, the AI opponents never focus on one target and break up any move happening in the ring. It makes it frustrating if you’re trying to throw someone out and get interrupted by someone who was just fighting someone in the opposite corner. The “stunned” meter is back, but definitely expedited. I never had an issue with people in multi-man matches rolling out of the ring for a minute, but because of how quickly the meter moves, you hardly have a chance for a one-on-one encounter in the ring in multi-man matches. Sure, it moves the match along, but using your fifth finisher and not being able to go for a pin is incredibly frustrating. 

The small details are what save the day. The biggest one that stands out is how the champions — who traditionally come to the ring last — will usually wait a moment before their music hits. It’s a tactic that Reigns usually uses in real life, and it’s cool to see it replicated here. That extra 10 seconds between the challenger and champion’s entrance makes the match feel special. 

A still from WWE 2K23 courtesy of 2K Games.

And massive props to the developers for nailing the aesthetics. Character models look great, but the arenas, and now stadiums, are what really catches my eye. It’s unlikely we’ll ever get the uber-long entrance ramp that WWE’s stadium shows like the Royal Rumble or SummerSlam have, but they adapted and nailed the stages of those shows and Clash at the Castle (the one I was most anticipating). A small nitpick from a New Yorker, the default stadium — which typically was just Metflife Stadium in previous games — now is Metlife Stadium with a roof like the Alamodome. Most won’t care or even notice, but it’s a thought that came to mind when playing through the PLEs.

New to the WWE 2K series is the WarGames match. Apparently, it has been around since the WCW days, but it’s been used more recently on NXT. Last year’s Survivor Series PLE rebranded and utilized the match in its opening and closing matches, but due to it taking place in November, it’s a welcomed surprise to have it not only in the game but playable in the Universe mode. For those unfamiliar with this match, the WarGames match is when two teams of either three or four in 2K23 face off. One member of the team is introduced at a time — giving one team an inherent disadvantage — but the official match doesn’t begin until all of the members of each team have entered the ring. It’s really fun just like the real-life version was in November. Hopefully, the WWE continues to utilize the match in real-life and the 2K games.

A still from WWE 2K23 courtesy of 2K Games.

MyRise got a nice refresh with a story that hits the ground running. I think it has become clear that the idea of working your way up the ranks from the Performance Center is both tired and monotonous in video game form. Last year’s MyRise was brutal to get through; you had to do a certain amount of objectives before moving on to the next part of the story similar to what the NBA 2K’s MyGM has become. 

This year’s Showcase mode is centered around John Cena. It’s a nice sign of self-awareness by 2K and Cena himself to allow for players to play as the opponents in these historical recreations given that “SuperCena” was a thing, and the developers once again nail the aesthetics to recreate all of Cena’s marquee moments. Hopefully, next year’s title will include a Bloodline Showcase.

MyGM got some updates, but controlling the shows is a lot less fun than the sandbox-like playstyle of Universe mode. You’re given a budget to control Raw or Smackdown, which is cool in theory, but outside of the draft, it’s hardly riveting. At least they came to their senses and added more than one-on-one matches to it.

The biggest dud of 2K23 has to be MyFaction. I’ve never been one for the Ultimate Team modes in the Fifa or Madden franchises or the NBA 2K’s equivalent, MyTeam, and I really don’t understand the appeal of a wrestling version of it outside of the updated aesthetics that certain models get since wrestlers change their outfits all the time and their in-game models usually stay stagnant.

A still from WWE 2K23 courtesy of 2K Games.

One last miss for me is the new pin system. The button-mashing option is still there — though I would rather not break my $75 controller — so that leaves you with the new, refreshed timing option. In previous years you had to press the “X” or “A” button when the white bar reached the red area, this year it’s similar except that the red area moves. It obviously gets smaller and moves faster the more damage you’ve taken, and you have to flip the right stick up when in that area (though I just opt to use the “X” button regardless). It’s incredibly infuriating, which maybe is the point, but not being able to kick out after a signature move has made me as angry as Jey Uso when Sami Zayn turned his back on the Bloodline.

A common complaint with yearly sports video games is that they’re glorified “roster updates” (to be fair, roster updates are more important in wrestling games but I digress), but 2K23 is another big step in the right direction after 2K22 set the entire series back on track. 2K23 is a very “Ucey” and one that we all have to acknowledge.


WWE 2K23 is available now.

FILM RATING
Continue Reading

Reviews

Shazam! Fury of the Gods Review | David F. Sandberg’s Latest is Far From a Lights Out Sequel

Hey, at least it’s better than ‘Black Adam’!

Published

on

Take this as you will, but 2019’s Shazam! is one of the DCEU’s best films. It’s no Birds of Prey — my gold standard for the DCEU — and it certainly doesn’t hold up quite as well on rewatch, but the pure adolescent joy that it radiated and its strong emotional beats made for a uniquely wholesome time for comic book movie fare.

“Nothing lasts forever,” as a character in Shazam! Fury of the Gods, the sequel to the 2019 film, warns Billy. This sentiment rings true unless you’re Kevin Feige, but it’s true in the case of Fury of the Gods, which goes bigger in almost every way than its predecessor. But clichés are clichés for a reason — and Fury of the Gods is proof that bigger is not always better. 

After the events of Shazam! which saw Billy Batson (portrayed by Asher Angel in his teenage form and Zachary Levi in adult form) spread the wealth and give his foster siblings powers like him, the group of superheroes, dubbed the “Philadelphia Fiascos” by the locals, are doing their best to save the day in the City of Brotherly Love. But like any group of teenage superheroes, they haven’t quite got this whole “superhero thing” down yet, as a comic book movie character would phrase it. They’re messy, but avoid any fatal casualties, which warrants a pat on the back in a universe where Superman and Batman kill, I guess. 

A still from Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Photo courtesy of Warner Bros.

Back in reality, or high school, things haven’t changed much. Freddy (portrayed by Jack Dylan Grazer in his teenage form and Adam Brody in his adult form) is still being picked on by the bullies from the first, even after showing them up by having his own “Bring Your Superman to School Day,” if you remember the post-credits scene from Shazam! (don’t worry; the writers assume you don’t and will remind you that this did, in fact, happen). But he soon meets a cute new girl, Anna (Rachel Zegler), who he hits it off with. Reality comes crashing down when it’s soon discovered that Anna, whose actual name is Anthea, is a daughter of Atlas and sister of Hespera (Helen Mirren) and Kalypso (Lucy Liu). It’s up to Billy and co. to stop them from getting the magical staff from the end of the first film (another event that the film handily shows as a refresher). 

Starting with the good, there are fractions of what made Shazam! work so well. When Freddy and Anna have their little meet cute, it’s actually quite endearing in the same way Andrew Garfield’s Peter Parker and Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy’s first encounters were in The Amazing Spider-Man. And the team dynamic of the foster kids — which to Billy is being compromised as he nears the point of “aging out” of his foster home — largely works. 

Each kid represents something different in the group, but some get more time in the sun than others. Grace Fulton, who has the distinctive chance to play both the teenage and adult versions of her character, Mary, is still contemplating her decision to not go to college and is facing the fact that being a superhero doesn’t pay the bills. Fulton has been getting better with every role as of late (watch Fall), and that carries on here. 

A still from Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Photo courtesy of Warner Bros.

Ross Butler, who plays the adult version of Eugene, is so charismatic but is still delegated to B-level hero in Fury of the Gods. If 13 Reasons Way proved anything, it’s that he’s capable of doing more than being a handsome jock (or superhero, in this case). Give him a Mason Gooding-like role and I’m sure he’ll show it.

The best actor of the bunch, who perfectly found a way to channel the innocence of her younger counterpart, is Meagan Good, who plays the superhero version of Darla. Faithe Herman is also great as the younger version of Darla, but it’s amazing how Good is able to perfectly channel Herman in her performance (hats off to casting director Rich Delia). She retains the wholesome eyes and childlike mind as her adult version Herman has. 

But the reality of it is, none of the kids get the spotlight like Billy and Freddy do. Grazer is his usual comedic self that always cracks a smile when on screen while Angel does his best in the limited time he has in the film. It’s both a blessing and a curse to be Billy Batson, as arguably the biggest name of the superheroes, Levi, is going to be used prominently throughout the film. At least to my knowledge of Shazam! — which is nothing to bet on — there was a good balance between young and old Billy. In Fury of the Gods, however, it feels like an 80/20 split between Levi and Angel.  Levi’s gawky fish out of water schtick — which is about half as endearing as a Michael Cera character — gets by but doesn’t always find himself on the right side of sweet and annoying.  

A still from Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Photo courtesy of Warner Bros.

Perhaps in the third film, we can return to the roots of these characters and focus more on the kids themselves. After all, if you want to namedrop the Fast & Furious franchise and its theme of family — one that’s referenced better than it is executed in Fury of the Gods — you have to hone in on that. I know Billy’s arc of searching for his mother is over, but it’s almost like a complete afterthought in Fury of the Gods until the end. Maybe it’s just that Billy is no longer the sole central character — though the third act would leave you to believe differently — or the fact that writers Henry Gayden and Chris Morgan were uninterested in exploring it with any substance. Either way, Marta Milans and Cooper Andrews, who play the foster parents Rosa and Victor Vásquez, are such a shining light in these films but are sidelined for most of Fury of the Gods

Gayden returns after being the sole writer credited on Shazam! and is teamed with Fast & Furious veteran Morgan (which explains the namedrop). The one thing I’ll give them credit for is Anthea’s storyline and not having her be the big bad while Freddy is too busy drooling through his rose-colored lenses to see this, but the rest of the story is a miss (there’s a bit involving the song “I Need a Hero” that is almost as bad as the line in I Wanna Dance With Somebody when Whitney Houston first hears the demo of the titular song and claims it’s “a song about two people who want to dance”). 

Like that bit, the rest of the humor is oftentimes dreadful and has two ends of the spectrum: There’s the side of Djimon Hounsou — who returns as the wizard from the previous film — who’s able to occasionally make the very dry jokes land, and then there’s the Helen Mirren side; who must have been returning a favor of some sort to Morgan during her time in the Fast franchise. She, above anyone else, seems the least interested to be there. But who can blame her? She didn’t even care enough to explain the synopsis on the press tour, so why would I expect anything more? 

Not to only pick on the great Mirren, Liu is not much better as Kalypso. The biggest issue with these antagonists is that there’s not enough time to sit with these characters. Their motives are quite clear, but that doesn’t make you care about them or their situation. Zegler works the most out of the three sisters of Atlas because she actually gets to interact with the younger characters. The trio of Mirren, Liu and Zegler is about as talented and star-studded as you can get, they’re just wasted. 

David F. Sandberg returns as the director of Fury of the Gods. While I’m a big fan of Lights Out — the best PG-13 horror flick in recent times and in dire need of a sequel — and Annabelle: Creation, something is missing in his Shazam! flicks. It’s not that he’s incapable of utilizing a big budget, but the finished product of Fury of the Gods reeks of a film spewed out of a corporate machine. The story is lackluster, even despite its best efforts, and the direction is uninspired. The CGI, in true DCEU fashion, is just as drab as usual. DC Comics have always had a grittier aesthetic to my knowledge and lean heavily into the mythology of it all, but some of the landscapes just look so dull. Say what you want about Marvel — many of their recent films have sucked — but very rarely do their films lack color. Even Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, which was a disappointment in almost all areas including the potential for its visuals, had color if nothing else. Fury of the Gods is oftentimes too dark and looks stuck in the “Snyderverse” era. 

A still from Shazam! Fury of the Gods. Photo courtesy of Warner Bros.

And Fury of the Gods follows the tradition of the Shazam! films with a third act that mostly takes place in the air above Philadelphia, just replace Mark Strong with a wooden dragon. There’s a little more emotional depth to this fight, but the DCEU has its own formula for its third acts much like how the MCU has its formula for everything. 

It’s disappointing that Fury of the Gods doesn’t live up to its predecessor. I imagine (and hope) that we’ll get more of these characters, which is great news considering how charismatic the teenage and adult versions of each are, but this second entry in the franchise is the downward dip that hopefully builds towards a satisfying trilogy closer. And just due to the standards that the DCEU has set for itself, Fury of the Gods still manages to be better than at least half of these films offhand and is a fine trip to the movies with your family — so take that as you will. Is it a good movie? No.

If we are to continue following Billy and the “Philadelphia Fiascos,” it sure does feel like we’ll only get bigger from here — I’m not a DCEU megafan, but aren’t we supposed to get Shazam vs. Black Adam? — assuming that these films continue. The whole future of the DCEU gives me a headache thinking about it, but I imagine that a third Shazam! film will be too big of an opportunity to pass up. Nevertheless, here’s hoping that any future installment scales it back and hones in on what made the first film so charming. And if nothing else, at least Fury of the Gods is better than Black Adam


Shazam! Fury of the Gods is in theaters now. 

FILM RATING
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Popular Now

Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING NOW

Trending

CoastalHouseMedia.com is a property of Coastal House LLC. © 2012 All Rights Reserved. Images used on this website are registered trademarks of their respective companies/owners.

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x