Connect with us


Blacklight Review | Liam Neeson Doing Liam Neeson Things



Who would’ve thought that a movie about a father trying to rescue his daughter who was kidnapped following U2 on tour (that poor girl!) would begin one of the best second acts in an actors’ career? It almost feels like an event in the first quarter of every year when a new Liam Neeson action-thriller graces the screen. There have been some great ones (I’m a big advocate of Non-Stop), and some forgettable ones (A Walk Among The Tombstones), but the one thing that cannot be denied is that Liam Neeson still kicks any and every ass in his way; even at 69 years old. Enter Blacklight, which is beginning to show Neeson’s age. I’ll admit, I missed The Ice Road, but I do remember there being some physical limitations in last year’s The Marksman. But what Neeson couldn’t do physically was compensated in the form of an endearing story about the bond between Neeson’s character and the young boy he is helping escape the cartel. Unfortunately, Blacklight has a lack of interesting characters outside of Neeson and plays more like a part-Liam Neeson action movie and part-90s political thriller, with the sum of the parts not equaling a great action movie.

Blacklight follows Travis Block (Liam Neeson), an FBI operative who gets entwined in a government conspiracy.

Liam Neeson in Blacklight. Photo courtesy of Briarcliff Entertainment and Open Road Films.

Now, with a synopsis like that, no one should be expecting great cinema from Blacklight. It’s a story that involves the usual tropes of the genre: Travis is roped back into his duties (which he generally follows blindly); Travis’ family life is a mess, including an estranged daughter and a granddaughter who is the light in his life; a conspiracy theorist, Dusty, (Talyor John Smith) who is made out to be a martyr of sorts; and a journalist who is divided between honest reporting and getting the headlines.

Blacklight is directed by Mark Williams, who directed one of the other Liam Neeson-led Open Road Films-Briarcliff Entertainment collaborations, Honest Thief, which was certainly not one of the brighter spots in Neeson’s filmography, but credit is due to the premise if nothing else. Having Neeson being framed while just trying to keep his nose clean was a cool twist, and some level of star power behind Neeson: Anthony Ramos, Jai Courtney, Kate Walsh, Robert Patrick.

Williams takes a film like Blacklight about as far as you can, but stylistic choices such as plenty of zoom-ins (that I think are supposed to represent a character having a flashback or regaining some locked-away memory). The zoom-ins are worse in action scenes where it feels more like a cutscene in an RPG video game than a movie.

The action, which is 98% of why people see these movies, is lackluster at best. I mentioned Neeson’s age beginning to show, and it’s most evident in foot chases, where the characters being chased have to be slowed down by nameless characters (e.g. security guards) while Neeson catches up off-screen, and fistfights. Neeson can still deliver believable left and rights, but there’s a point where a character has Travis on the ropes, holding his arm up while pinning him to the ground. If you really wanted to stop Travis from continuing to pursue you, kick that arm and it’s broken. Instead, that character just kicks him in the body and continues to run off. This is not advocating for Neeson to get his arm broken in a movie, and maybe the pulled-back nature of the action is due to one of three things: the PG-13 rating, Neeson’s age, or Neeson having some clause in his contract that exempts him from taking that sort of punishment a la Vin Diesel and The Rock’s F&F contracts that stipulated that each actor had even punches or whatever the case was. Either way, the action (thankfully) didn’t feature any of the ridiculous quick edits that you’d see in either of the Taken sequels (maybe even the first, I don’t remember it being as egregious) where you wouldn’t see the action taking place, you’d hear whiffs of punches, grunting, and eventually, someone would hit the ground. Mercifully, that is not the case in Blacklight, but you just get action scenes that Neeson’s character in Unknown would remember.

But Neeson’s characters have also evolved. They went from just kicking your ass to trapping the bad guys inside while locking them in with one of those digital home systems that you can control on your phone and slamming on the brakes so the person in the backseat has a face-to-face interaction with the seat in front of them. It’s what parents do when their kids are fighting in the backseat. No, just me? Moving on…

Exempt from any of the same star power aside from Neeson is Blacklight. Trade Anthony Ramos for Taylor John Smith, whose only remarkable character trait is his eyes that would get him as a model for any cologne he would want. Emmy Raver-Lampman is fine, but her character of Mira gets bogged down in the melodramatic “scoop or be scooped” plot as a journalist. It’s like the film wanted to go with a House of Cards-like plotline, but settled on a plot where Mira hardly gets into any trouble aside from being scooped. Gabriella Sengos — who plays Travis’ granddaughter, Natalie — is another standout but mostly for the fact that she has wholesome interactions with Neeson.

None of that is to say that Neeson has some unique and great performance in Blacklight; hardly the case, but you can always count on him giving you the same type of protagonist that makes him this generation’s Clint Eastwood. When we first meet Travis, he is driving a sports car as if he’s on the way to meet La Familia at the barbeque (that makes two F&F references!). The only thing more amazing than that imagery is the fact that Neeson looks nowhere near 69. The man has aged like a fine wine since the 90s, and it continues to be one of the Wonders of the World.

Blacklight isn’t anything that you haven’t seen if you have watched any of Liam Neeson’s previous action-thrillers from the last decade or In The Line of Fire for that matter, and it stinks that the main plot didn’t put any sort of spin on the Liam Neeson genre like recent entries Non-Stop, Honest Thief and The Marksman did. But luckily, it still feels like there is tread left on Neeson’s action career tires, and let’s hope that like Travis in the film, he won’t hang it up any time soon. We’re reaching the point to just be thankful for Neeson’s willingness and ability to continue churning out action movies once (or recently, twice) a year. Memory, directed by Martin Campbell (Casino Royale, The Protégé), is coming later this spring from Open Road Films and Briarcliff Entertainment, who must be big Neeson fans if they keep producing and distributing his movies. Maybe Memory can get the Neeson genre back on track.

Open Road Films and Briarcliff Entertainment will release Blacklight on February 11.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Choose or Die – A Miss For Netflix



Netflix’s home page suggestions can always be hit or miss, and unfortunately its latest release ‘Choose or Die’ falls into the category of the latter. Captivated by Asa Butterfield on the poster, I was curious to see what this film had to offer and begrudgingly it didn’t have a lot.

We follow Kayla, a broke student who has a lot to deal with in terms of her family situation and being the sole provider for herself and her mum. She then stumbles upon a retro video game from the 80s which forces her to choose and ultimately leads to various chain reactions of horrific events involving people close to her.

Lola Evans as Kayla and Asa Butterfield as Isaac

The premise of the film sounds interesting, however, I think it swings and misses quite early into the film’s first act. Eddie Marsan sets the tone and trail of interest for Choose or Die as we are introduced to this sadistic game and the chain of events it will inevitably pursue. 

Choose or Die doesn’t make it easy to empathise with its characters, finding any connection to Kayla or Isaac was difficult. This ‘are they aren’t they’ subplot lingers throughout the film’s narrative but adds nothing to the overarching story. The supporting characters, such as Thea and Laura, are much more interesting and genuinely have you intrigued as to what decisions they will make.

What stood out to me was the violent and gore-like scenes of 80s horrors, with some pretty good stomach churning special effects make-up. Those intense scenes, one involving a rat, had me genuinely glued to the screen, anticipating what may happen next. Choose or Die’s strongest component are the early moral decisions Kayla has to make and ultimately demonstrate Meakin’s passion for the horror genre.

Ioanna Kimbook as Grace in Choose or Die, seen here in the diner in one of the more grotesque decisive moments for Kayla

The way in which this film is shot, felt very “student-esque” with its lackluster camera movements and setting. The set design lacked little depth, except for Isaac’s room which is full of detail, therefore making the world feel small and less three dimensional. An element which pulled me out of this cinematic experience, was the fact that this was evidently filmed in the United Kingdom, and the cast contained predominantly a lot of British actors doing an American accent so I wasn’t fully immersed into this world. 

Meakins clearly uses his passion for the horror genre to influence this film’s dark tone, from it’s leading characters’ moral compass as well as the gorey visuals that inevitably come with those decisions. The whole world feels cold and derelict, be it the place in which Kayla cleans or the housing estate of which she lives in, this is an unwelcoming world that no-one wants to comfort you in. 

Choose or Die isn’t a film that will stick out as one that defined 2022, however I’m sure someone will take something away from this film, be it’s reference to 80s gaming or the violent and graphic elements that the director is clearly passionate about. 

Continue Reading


Anaïs in Love Review | The Worst Person in France



Right on the heels of the stellar film, The Worst Person in the World, a film about a woman named Julie (Renate Reinsve), who is in a transitional state in her life and going through a millennial “mid-life” crisis. Enter Charline Bourgeois-Tacquet’s Anaïs in Love, a film about a 30-year-old woman named Anaïs (Anaïs Demoustier) who is down on her luck and can’t find true love. Both Joachim Trier’s capper to the Oslo trilogy and Anaïs in Love tell authentic stories about millennials, and while the latter doesn’t pack quite as much of an emotional punch as The Worst Person in the World, it’s a strong character piece about not just finding what you want in life, but taking it.

The similarities between Julie and Anaïs, while perhaps a tired comparison, are too prominent to ignore (lead actress Anaïs Demoustier could even be mistaken for Renate Reinsve in a certain light). For one, they are similar in age; perhaps resulting in their similar struggles. While Anaïs doesn’t go on quite as experimental of a sexual journey as Julie, neither can find true love. Neither feel ready for kids—at least at the beginning of their respective films. The former can’t even sleep in the same bed as another guy (or ride an elevator, for that matter), much less stay committed to a guy. They also both work in a bookstore but this similarity isn’t as important as it was amusing for me. And yet, despite wanting someone who knows what they want, Anaïs struggles with this.

Anaïs Demoustier is a great leading actor and plays the character of the same name with the right balance of indecision and innocence. There’s also a wide-eyed, cheery aura about her akin to a young child. Take, for instance, the scene where Anaïs first encounters Emilie. She is overjoyed to be speaking with her, and she’s overjoyed as if she has just seen a face that she won’t forget the time or place where they met (yes, that’s a Beatles reference). Demoustier is an experienced actress with plenty of credits to her name, yet she is someone that I was not familiar with coming into Anaïs in Love but am now eager to check out some of her other roles as she is really good in Anaïs in Love.

A still from Anaïs in Love. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

Opposite Demoustier is Valeria Bruni Tedeschi as Emilie, the woman that Anaïs falls in love with in the film. She is also great, with her playing the more mature one in the “fling.” At some point in the film, she exclaims that at the age of 50, she’s no longer scared by much, if anything at all. It’s a reflection of what Anaïs strives for, and yet, in the end, Emilie is not able to hold back as much as she’d like. But Bruni Tedeschi’s cherry on top comes in the form of a monologue towards the end. What is said will not be spoiled here, but both Bruni Tedeschi and Demoustier give great performances in this scene. It’s by far the most human and relatable part of the film, and applause is deserved for the directing, writing, and acting in this particular scene.

A still from Anaïs in Love. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

Imagine this: You’re sleeping with someone and then end up falling for their partner. As absurd as it sounds, this is exactly what happens to our titular character, Anaïs. Emilie is one of Anaïs’ favorite authors and just so happens to live with Daniel (Denis Podalydès). After following her to a stop on her book tour, Anaïs only falls harder for Emilie like a teenager and their first love.

Smartly, Anaïs in Love doesn’t just hand the audience what they want. Reading the synopsis of the film, it’s clear that Anaïs is going to fall for Emilie at some point or another, but Bourgeois-Tacquet takes her time getting to this—the two don’t have a substantial encounter until about an hour in—and as Billy Joel said, “she only reveals what she wants you to see.” There is a lot of scenes of “sexual tension” as the kids say, and it does eventually pay off, but one can appreciate the choice to make the film a marathon, not a sprint.

Director Charline Bourgeois-Tacquet. Photo courtesy of Magnolia Pictures.

Within the span of a few months, there have been two movies for millennials that are going through crises. While it doesn’t quite reach as much of millennial life as The Worst Person in the World, Anaïs in Love tells a story of love and maturing on its own terms; and that’s quite special. Excellent film and one that should not be slept on.

Anaïs in Love is in select theaters now and will be available on VOD Friday, May 6.

Continue Reading


Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness | Non-Spoiler Review |



If nothing else, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is a reminder of how the theatrical experience and the MCU go together like Al Pacino and screaming. With the sheer number of MCU projects to keep tabs on, it can feel overwhelming and redundant in all honesty. For as well-acted as Moon Knight is and as unique WandaVision was — at least for the first eight episodes — but something about a tentpole film needs the big screen to fully do it justice. No, Multiverse of Madness is not as good of a multiverse movie as Everything Everywhere All at Once, but Sam Raimi’s stylistic panache bleeds through enough to make it feel different than other MCU projects; at least for portions of Multiverse of Madness.

Maybe it’s just the comfort of seeing a character such as Dr. Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch), who has really grown into the likable hero that the MCU needs to lead them into the foreseeable future. His first outing was rough; it felt as if the MCU was trying to force him into being the next Tony Stark like the WWE did with Roman Reigns and John Cena way back when. But over time, with cameos in Thor: Ragnarok and a prominent role in Infinity War, Cumberbatch and the creative teams have worked to make the character more likable. They have succeeded for my money, and while Cumberbatch is capable of so much more, he’s a really good Dr. Stephen Strange for what it’s worth.

Joining Strange on his quest across the multiverse are Wong (Benedict Wong), the Sorcerer Supreme, and newcomer America Chavez (Xochitl Gomez). The former plays the same role he has in all of his other appearances, that’s not a critique as much as an honest observation. The banter you’ve been hearing since Infinity War (perhaps the first Dr. Strange film as well, I loathe it and didn’t rewatch it ahead of time) is found in the Multiverse of Madness. Gomez brings much-needed youth to the forefront, and while she is a damsel in distress and the MacGuffin of the film, her energy and chemistry with Cumberbatch make her a stand out.

Promos for the Multiverse of Madness made it appear as though this was Wanda’s origin story. There’s a brilliant line about how Wanda bending the rules gets looked down upon as compared to when Strange does, and the conflict between the two is gripping. Elizabeth Olsen has come so far as Wanda and is becoming one of the best parts of the entire MCU. This is her best performance by a long shot, even better than WandaVision, due in big part to the turn she takes. There isn’t much more to say without spoilers, but it’s the Elizabeth Olsen show.

Elizabeth Olsen as Wanda Maximoff in Marvel Studios’ DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. ©Marvel Studios 2022. All Rights Reserved.

[Insert Raimi camera swerve] In regards to Sam Raimi’s vision, for those concerned, there are the signature camera movements expected from a Sam Raimi film. And there are some actual horror elements for what feels like the first time in the MCU. It’s not a PG-13 horror film on the same level as Lights Out, but it’s a refreshing change of tone when the scenes of horror play out. And leave it to the creator of the Evil Dead franchise to have a character covered in blood for an entire fight sequence. Many directors have come and gone in the MCU, but Raimi undoubtedly makes his presence known more than the rest.

Again, Everything Everywhere All at Once really nailed the multiverse in a way that makes it hard to top. There’s an emotional weight in that film that is absent from the Multiverse of Madness. Yes, I get it, Wanda is still recovering from the events of WandaVision and Dr. Strange is dealing with the aftermath of past decisions in his first solo venture and Infinity War, but the film keeps up a fast pace and doesn’t stop to marinade in the sorrow for very long. One similarity the film does share with Everything Everywhere All at Once is how Wanda channels other variants of herself. No, there are no paper cuts or chewing gum from beneath a desk, but it was a similarity worth noting.

On left: Benedict Cumberbatch as Dr. Stephen Strange in Marvel Studios’ DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. ©Marvel Studios 2022. All Rights Reserved.

Perhaps above all of the other minor issues that are found in the Multiverse of Madness—a lackluster script, spotty CGI, failing to set something exciting up for the future of the MCU—the biggest one of all is that for as good of an effort as Raimi puts in to make the film feel outside of the box, the Multiverse of Madness still fits into that box more often than not. It’s very much a dog scared of its own shadow in the way that Raimi’s style only carries the film so far. There is some extra gore, a few PG-13 jump scares, and far more dark elements than other MCU projects, but the action sequences feel like an MCU action sequence and the film very much follows a linear three-act structure.

The film hits the ground running, getting right to its first action sequence within minutes, but it follows the basic formula of a nightmare proceeded by the hero waking up in a panic, attending some mundane event (a wedding in this case) before it is interrupted by some big force that requires the help of a superhero. From there, Strange fights the giant squid which reminds me of the giant eye in The Suicide Squad. Oh, and to clarify, that nightmare “wasn’t just a dream, it’s the multiverse” as America Chavez states.

Elizabeth Olsen as Wanda Maximoff in Marvel Studios’ DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS. Photo courtesy of Marvel Studios. ©Marvel Studios 2022. All Rights Reserved.

Another common flaw that the film, with just about every other MCU movie, has is that there are no real stakes. Not every film needs world-ending stakes, but being that this is a sequel film to an established character, you could play with the audience. For example, how fun is it to watch professional wrestling if you’re sitting there thinking, “Hey, this stuff is fake!”? There has to be suspension of disbelief in the case of professional wrestling, and MCU movies need to add stakes in films that don’t have the scope of films like Infinity War or Endgame.

In the end, Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness is a really cool comic book flick. You can’t take away the fact that it can sometimes feel different from other MCU projects and is likely the closest thing the MCU will make to a horror film. And while it doesn’t always work or land with the emotional punch it wants, the film is able to entertain and is unlikely to bore casual MCU viewers. It should be stated that while there are some awesome cameos, don’t go in expecting cameo galore (the best one shines in the post-credits scene, by the way). Danny Elfman’s score also kicks all kinds of ass with a guitar riff that features the level of tenacity The Edge had on Love is Blindness. Good stuff, Marvel.

Dr. Strange in the Multiverse of Madness will be released on May 6.

Continue Reading

Popular Now




Would love your thoughts, please comment.x