Connect with us


A Quiet Place Part II | Review



This review is spoiler-free.

It’s not often that a film comes along and demands to be seen on the big screen, creating a cinematic experience unlike any other and that’s something the Quiet Place films definitely do. I may have learnt this the hard way, by watching the first film on a plane and not really enjoying it, only to re-watch it again at home and really like it. But now, seeing A Quiet Place Part II in an IMAX cinema, having not been in a cinema for months, it is truly a spectacular cinematic event.

After a brief flashback sequence to when the creatures first arrived, A Quiet Place Part II picks up exactly where the first film left off. If you’ve seen the first, you’ll know that it ended in a very exciting position and now we witness the Abbott family struggling to navigate and struggling to survive in the post-apocalyptic world, ravaged by monsters that hunt by sound.

AQP2 is a really tense and engaging thriller film however it never quite reaches the heights that its predecessor did. The first film managed to create a level of immense tension and sustain that pretty much the entire way through the film’s runtime. Here, it feels like there were certain scenes that were very tense and have you squirming in your seat but the bits between these scenes lack the same sense of dread and fear that the first did and in that sense the sequel is not quite as tight as the first.

At just 97 minutes long, it’s only 7 minutes longer than the first but it does feel quite a bit longer. The first film goes by in a flash and it’s over before you know it and whilst AQP2 doesn’t feel overly long, the pacing of it makes you notice the runtime that bit more than the first film.

There are a few very suspenseful and scary moments in it, particularly the opening flashback scene to the Abbott family’s first encounter with the creatures. In fact, even that pesky nail from the first film makes a small cameo here but what stands out so much and what makes it a real ‘cinema film’ is the fantastic sound design. Every single time one of the creatures is even remotely near one of the main characters or any time that the creatures just might be nearby, the sound design completely draws you into it and makes you feel like you’re there and that’s what makes these frightening moments all the more impactful.

A lot of the criticisms and faults with A Quiet Place Part II do largely come from the fact that it’s not as good as the first and it’s weaker by comparison, but it’s still a very smart and entertaining film that provides some genuine chills. The concept of creatures that hunt on sound is such a great idea and it plays out on screen so well. Every single time one of the main characters make even the slightest noise your heart stops and your hold your breath, waiting to see if the creatures are going to show up and if our heroes will meet their untimely demise.

One issue I had with the film was that you could always tell where the next scare was going to come from. The film is by no means predictable, it just sticks to some generic tropes and it’s clear where it’s going. Everyone knows in a scary situation in a horror movie you don’t split up. But that doesn’t stop our protagonists from doing so and it’s small details like that that when they happen you can immediately tell the consequences of certain actions will crop up again a few scenes later. But even when that payoff comes it’s still shocking and the film still delivers in the thrills and scares that you want from a film like this.

A Quiet Place Part II is a riveting and frightening film and whilst it doesn’t quite match the level of tension achieved in the first, it is nonetheless a hugely entertaining film and one that you absolutely must see on the biggest screen you can.


A Quiet Place Part II is released in UK cinemas on June 3

Continue Reading
Advertisement 22-12-19-20-AM
Click to comment
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments


Separation | Slow Atmosphere and Surprising Twists

Marriage Story.



If you’re a horror fan, chances are you’ve heard of William Brent Bell. His disastrous 2012 found-footage gimmick The Devil Inside was nothing but an upsell to a [now defunct] website link showcased how the film’s “story” ended. The Boy (and its sequel) were also terrible but not as offensive as The Devil Inside. Bell has already made a name for himself with that 2012 film, but he’s back, with a vengeance this time around, with Separation. Aptly titled, the film tells the story of comic book artist Jeff Vahn (Rupert Friend), who is in the process of finalizing a divorce from his wife, Maggie (Mamie Gummer), and determining who will get custody of their child, Jenny (Violet McGraw). However, Maggie suddenly dies after being hit by a car, and Jenny’s custody reverts to Jeff. Maggie’s father, Paul (Brian Cox), believes Jeff had something to do with the accident, but more pressing matters are at hand as Maggie’s spirit begins to haunt Jeff and Jenny, with the latter having some spiritual “attachment” with her. And if you’ve seen Bell’s previous films, it’s no different here. Just a dull and dreary “atmospheric horror” picture with some of the worst acting of the year.


Granted, the acting isn’t all bad here. Rupert Friend and Brian Cox manage to hold their own even when the script starts to (quite literally) shit the bed. As of late, Cox has been an expert in playing irredeemable scumbags, and he brilliantly implements the talents he developed from Succession here seamlessly. It doesn’t matter if he pretty much plays the same dickish character as in the popular HBO show; Cox is always entertaining and seems to be the only one that truly cares about whatever film role he landed in, whether good or bad. On the other hand, Friend cannot carry a lead role in any movie. That was apparent in Hitman: Agent 47, but he seems determined to do good in Separation, even if the material is rather hackneyed.

How is it hackneyed, you ask? Well, for starters, it’s not scary. There’s a fairly creepy (if you will) ghost-like figure of a puppet that bends itself à la Pennywise/It that’s somewhat effective, but it’s only featured when Jeff has nightmares. Most of the “scares” happening in the film are inside Jeff (or Jenny’s) mind, which results in a rather weightless horror film. Maggie’s reincarnated spirit is as scary looking like the nightmare fuel wooden puppet in Steve Barron’s The Adventures of Pinocchio, whilst incorporating Udo Kier’s looks from that same film. [Side note: if you want to traumatize the living hell out of children, make them watch that movie]. It’s the only type of comparison I can recall since the film is still highly vivid in my memory, and everything looks so unsettling here. That’s a good thing, though, since the film has some sort of artistic vision.

Separation Cast And Character Guide (with Ending Spoilers)

The problem is: Bell and writers Nick Amadeus and Josh Braun don’t do anything with it to make it interesting in any capacity. Maggie is just…there…and passively haunts Jeff or the babysitter, Samantha (Madeline Brewer). And the more the film progresses, the easier it is to tell how apparent it is that it has absolutely nothing of interest to say about anything. Instead, it needlessly fills its time through tedious sequences in which Jeff has “visions” of “The Darkness,” which will eventually become the inspiration for his next comic, or he’ll try (and fail) to communicate with Maggie’s spirit through an Ayahuasca trip that’s both visually drab and completely unengaging. Heck, a drug this potent merits something truly insane, embracing its dark atmosphere to the fullest extent. Yet Bell never cares about any of that and solely focuses on how the “spirit” quasi-communicates to Jenny instead. But since we don’t spend much time with her, there’s no legitimate emotional connection to her or any of what’s happening in Separation. Oh, poor Jeff, he must fight Maggie’s evil father, who wants to take Jenny away from him, while at the same time worrying about Jenny’s mental state as Maggie’s spirit takes hold of her. If you don’t find that interesting, how about developing a will-they/won’t they relationship between Jeff and Samantha? Feels so 2000’s, right?

It’s also interesting to see how truly cheap the film’s VFX is, which exacerbates, even more, its penchant for early 2000s horror made by large studios. I wouldn’t be surprised if the film’s script were plucked from a list of unproduced movies made around that time that the previously defunct OpenRoad studios decided to…go for it in the hopes that it would revive their business. Spoiler alert: it doesn’t. Once its “twist” on who murdered Maggie gets revealed, Separation never really recovers. I don’t want to give it away because curious people reading this review may want to experience it for themselves at least once in their lives. So I’ll say this: it’s wild. It’s something you half-expect if you’re paying close attention to it, but it still absolutely makes no sense in the broader context of the picture. There’s something Bell likes to do and does it well, craft some of the worst endings I’ve seen in horror. It’s either non-endings, in the case of The Devil Inside, or ludicrous “revelations” in the case of his The Boy films and Separation. Here’s some food for thought: this entire film is ludicrous.

Separation wants to impress with its “slow atmosphere” and surprising twists. Yet, its twist reveals nothing strictly but turns the film’s serious setting into an unintentional comedy, absolutely deserving of every potential Golden Raspberry it will get. If you want a unique cinematic experience and continue to observe how William Brent Bell destroyed Giallo-like endings with his horror movies whilst seeing good potential squandered in an endless cesspool of…nothing…then Separation might be for you. Otherwise, stay as far away as possible [and from The Adventures of Pinocchio too…yikes.]

Continue Reading


Escape Room: Tournament of Champions | Review



Ever since escape rooms became a big hit in real life and people couldn’t get enough of being locked in a room, having to solve puzzles to escape, it was only a matter of time before screenwriters took the idea and turned it into a horror film. And that’s exactly what happened. Over the past few years there have been a great number of films titles Escape Room or revolving around the idea of an escape room with a dark and deadly twist to it. But only the 2019 film Escape Room directed by Adam Robitel received a sequel in the form of Escape Room: Tournament of Champions.

Don’t worry if you can’t remember which film called Escape Room this is a sequel to because the film opens with a recap of the events of the first film, almost like you’re watching the “previously on..” section at the beginning of a TV show. The film sees Zoey (Taylor Russell) and Ben (Logan Miller) who narrowly survived the escape room in the previous film and now they’re out to bring justice to the evil corporation known as Minos and put a stop to their dastardly murders.

The two arrive in New York City and are unexpectedly trapped in a subway carriage with four other people and much like the previous film, they must escape from a series of complicated and deadly escape rooms or face death. The twist this time around, as the title suggest, is that all of the people trapped in the room are the winners of previous escape rooms and this is now a tournament of champions.

The set-up feels much more contrived this time around and the whole thing really verges into the realm of being incredibly far-fetched and unbelievable, far more than the first film ever did. But if you’re willing to go with it Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is an absolute blast of a time and even better than the first film.

In the words of one of the film’s characters “We play the game, or we die”. It’s as simple as that. And if you’re happy to go along with it, Tournament of Champions is a gripping rollercoaster thriller ride that doesn’t stop until the very end when the credits start to roll.

Whilst not as gory as the Saw franchise, the Escape Room films definitely take inspiration from the former with each of the different rooms having some deadly twist to them. But whereas in Saw you watch the traps for the bloody murders, in Escape Room, you’re entertained by all the deadly rooms because of the intelligent ways the characters discover to escape. You hold your breath as the clock counts down to their imminent death, on the edge of your seat, hoping they solve the puzzle to escape the room.

The rooms feel more intricate and the puzzles harder to solve this time around but that only makes it even more tense. The whole film is packed full of suspense as you don’t know who’s going to live and who’s going to die. Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is a heart-racing thrill ride that manages to up the thrills, the suspense and the intensity of all the rooms.

However, much like the first film, it does go a little off the rails as we approach the film’s denouement, and the writers try to tie everything together. The ending does make it feel a bit too cheesy and does put a bit of a damper on the rest of the film, but because of how thrilling the rest of the film is, you can just about get passed that.

Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is a thoroughly engaging and thrilling film that will have you engrossed and entertained right up until the very end and if you’re willing to look past the film’s incredibly contrived and far-fetched plot, there’s no reason why you shouldn’t have a great time with this film.


Escape Room: Tournament of Champions is released in cinemas on Friday 16th July.

Continue Reading


Son (2021) | Film Review



Son opens with a really strong scene that immediately grabs your attention, in fact it demands your attention. We see Laura (Halloween’s Andi Matichak) driving frantically away from something. We don’t quite know what she’s running from but against the heavy downpour of rain and the empty streets we see Laura giving birth in her car. The film then flashes forward a few years and picks up with Laura’s son now a young child. This bleak, dreary opening sets the film up really well but unfortunately Son doesn’t quite manage to reach this level of fear again until towards the end of the film.

After the opening scene the film picks up with Laura’s son David now eight years old and one night a mysterious group of people break into their house in an attempt to kidnap him. Laura runs to call the police and to get help from their neighbour but once the police arrive they find no sign of forced entry or of anyone else ever having been in the house. And thus the creepy atmosphere of the film starts to build as we begin to realise that something’s not quite right with David or Laura. Or both of them. Nonetheless, the detective played by Emile Hirsch (The Autopsy of Jane Doe) believes Laura and shows some sympathy towards her.

Not long later, David starts to get very sick and he starts throwing up blood so Laura takes him to the hospital and just as you might expect in a horror film like this, the doctors don’t quite know what’s wrong with David. All this mystery building up and the atmosphere carries a sense of foreboding but there is always this sense of familiarity and of feeling like you know where the film is going to get to by the end of it which does take away from the fearful feeling that the filmmakers would want you to have.

It’s not just David that’s not well either as Laura is afflicted with horrific nightmares and dreams about the cult that she escaped from before David was born. Laura fears that the hospital staff are a part of this cult too and so she takes David and the two go on the run in search of safety. The two are on their own now as David becomes increasingly ill, suffering from psychosis and convulsions and Laura starts to do whatever she can to protect her son.

Now that the two are on the run from the police and trying to get to safety, again, it has that sense of familiarity and despite the film’s potential, the problem is you know exactly where the film’s going and the ending feels very predictable. There are some strong ideas in there and there are definitely some gnarly scenes too to really put you at unease but ultimately it doesn’t feel particularly fresh or new.

There’s enough gore and thrills in Son to keep you entertained and Andi Matichak and Luke David Blumm both give excellent performances, which elevates the film, and is particularly praiseworthy for such a young actor. But despite a few very tense and chilling scenes, overall there’s nothing too daunting.


Son is streaming exclusively on Shudder now.

Continue Reading


Popular Now


Top Box-Office


Would love your thoughts, please comment.x